Then, because of the high logistics cost, it does not support no reason to return. Is the reason sufficient? Should large furniture products be excluded from the scope of the 7-day unreasonable return? Is it in compliance with the provisions of the Consumer Law?
Consumers confirm that goods that are not suitable for return at the time of purchase? These issues need to be discussed in depth. When the Consumer Law has no reason to return the goods on the 7th, it also stipulates that the goods returned by the consumers should be in good condition.
The investigation and analysis found that the e-commerce companies should extend the goods to the packaging in good condition. In addition, the vast majority of e-commerce definitions of packaging are not clear enough to lead to limited consumer rights.
yang lantai noda padat gelap
<a href='http://malaysiafurniture.tk/malaysia/2167.html'>Bahan terbaik untuk dek</a>
<a href='http://malaysiafurniture.tk/discount/1615.html'>papan kayu plastik untuk lantai luar untuk dijual</a>